Achebe objects to Conrad’s Heart of Darkness being regarded as "permanent
literature – read and taught and constantly evaluated by serious
academics" (2). Achebe believes the text and the author are racist and he
supports this argument with a vast amount of evidence, which makes it very convincing.
Examples can be noted in Conrad’s descriptions of Africans as being
"monstrous", "unearthly" and almost "inhuman"
(4). There is an Us and Them dichotomy created, with the
Africans being the Other.
In Apocalypse Now, the
character of Willard plays a more active role than his counterpart, Marlow, in Heart of Darkness. As a
soldier, Willard participates in the destruction of the land and the Vietnamese
civilians, while Marlow is more of an observer. Nevertheless in both Apocalypse
Now and Heart of Darkness, the Others – Vietnamese or African respectively –
that are presented are not given a voice. White males are the driving force of
both stories. In a modern screen adaptation of an arguably outdated novella,
why is it still white men who have the overriding voices? Although it has been
argued that Apocalypse Now is an anti-war film, with satirical moments
such as the Flight of the Valkyries scene, it needs to go a step further in its
representations of different races.
No comments:
Post a Comment