The use of animals as symbols for nationality is something
which Maus has been hugely praised for. There are various reasons for this, two
of which will be explored in this blog post: firstly, the artist’s assigning of
mice to the role of the Jewish people is often considered a kind of reclamation
of sinister Nazi propaganda at the time of the Holocaust, and secondly, the
choice of animal for each nationality act as metaphors for perceptions of that
nation’s or social group’s role during the second world war.
It’s a relatively well-known fact that much Nazi propaganda
in the 1940s painted the Jewish community as a kind of vermin; artwork and the
written word alike characterised Jews as rats and mice in order to spread the
idea of them being a dirty, plague-like race in need of extermination, which of
course ties in disturbingly with their later slaughter and imprisonment in
concentration camps. In Maus, Art Spiegelman anthropomorphises Jews as mice in
a very intentional manner – they are not rats, but something smaller, more
delicate, and much less capable of defending themselves. The fact that the Nazi
members are depicted as cats further emphasises this suggested vulnerability,
and the Americans being represented by dogs completes the totem-pole of power,
essentially putting the Jews at the bottom of the proverbial food-chain through
no fault of their own. Thus, the creator of Maus uses the symbol of the mouse to do something entirely different than showing the Jews as a threatening presence - instead, he makes the argument to the reader that they were and are the very opposite.
Wow, Olivia that was a great observation. I had not realized the softening effect of portraying Jews as mice instead of rats. Rats are annoying, disgusting, disease ridden and plain old ugly to look at. Mice are cuter, smaller, cleaver and are kept as pets. Art Spiegelman does an excellent portraying the two distinct images visually.
ReplyDelete