One of the main differences between O’brien’s
storytelling and speigelman’s is Speigelman’s use of pictures throughout his story
telling. I find that these little portraits pertaining to the story help the
reader connect better with what he is saying as the readers can get a visual
image of Speigelman rather than creating their own. Preferably I like Speigleman’s
way of storytelling mainly because the pictures are entertaining. Another thing
different between the two are all of O’brien’s stories may not be the truth as
a true war story is never a true one he mentions. So far Speigelman’s stories
seem to be true rather than exaggerated or told a different way from what
actually happened. One thing similar I noticed between O’brien’s and Speigleman’s
writing style is they seem to stop in the middle of telling a story and say
something completely random for example in Maus
he is in the middle of explaining how he had one hour to clean a stable and in
the middle of it he stops to say “you’re dropping on the carpet cigarette
ashes. You want it should be like a stable here?” (Speigleman 52). Throughout The Things They Carried O’brien does
this much throughout his book.
I agree with your point. I had a better understanding of what was going on with a visuals with Maus. While O'Brien did a wonderful job creating visuals with text, I think Speigelman had a great twist with his visuals and representing different cultural groups with animals. I thought definitely the way each authors told their stories was a good contrast.
ReplyDelete