Tim O’Brien uses techniques of repetition and contradiction
to attempt to show the reader how the mind functions after traumatic events.
The death of Curt Lemon is a perfect example of how O’Brien utilizes both
repetition and contradiction to portray a message. Lemon’s death is brought up six different
times throughout the short story. Each time, the death contains more detail and
is portrayed more gruesomely. I think he wrote about the death so many
different times to show what its like to have PTSD. This disease, which many
soldiers suffer from, can cause the mind to have recurring, circular thoughts.
I think he decides to tell the story of the death in different ways to show
another struggle: the fact that memory is not a perfect source. The different retellings
of Lemon’s death also tend to contradict each other. The first time he tells
the story, he says, “it was almost beautiful, the way the sunlight came around
him and lifted him up and sucked him high into a tree.” Later, when he talks
about the death again, he describes the horrific process of peeling Lemon’s
guts from the tree. I think the reason that O’Brien contradicts himself in his
descriptions is again to show how one’s mind begins to think while enduring
traumatic situations. Perhaps he contradicting descriptions are intended to show
how the mind will try to make light of a dark situation and look for any glimpse
of happiness or joy in an otherwise dark environment. This is how the
techniques of repetition and contradiction are used to reveal the psychological
repercussions of PTSD.
I agree that contradiction plays a significant role throughout this chapter. In O'Brien's six formulations of Lemon's death, however, I didn't myself see a contradiction of recollection. Rather, it's like you observed initially: each account offers more detail, and frames the same experience in different ways. This does reveal other contradictions of course, most strikingly to me the contradiction between war's aesthetic and its action. Perhaps aesthetically, Lemon's death DID exhibit some visceral beauty, despite its grizzly circumstance and tragedy. So perhaps his reformulations are with this paradox in mind? I appreciate the notion of the narrative also signifying a way of coping with PTSD - finding poetry in tragedy and gore, and working back to the unglamorous fact of history.
ReplyDelete